<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2010 Session of the Missouri Legislature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://into-nature.com/2010/04/09/the-2010-session-of-the-missouri-legislature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://into-nature.com/2010/04/09/the-2010-session-of-the-missouri-legislature/</link>
	<description>Don Corrigan - Environmental Journalist and Nature Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://into-nature.com/2010/04/09/the-2010-session-of-the-missouri-legislature/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://into-nature.com/?p=258#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting poll questions and results. It does, of course, reveal a  liberal bias in the sample, as one might expect.

Even the insiders behind the increasingly obvious political power scam that is &quot;global warming&quot; have been replacing that term, with &quot;climate change&quot; since legitimate science informs us that a normal cyclical period of global cooling is currently underway. 

It is, or should be, clear by now to all that such shifts are not man-made. Yet, none of this seems to be having any effect on DC&#039;s bizarre locked-in political climate policies, as they continue with mindless anti-ghoulies and ghosties activity.

And what remains unclear about the superior effectiveness and safety of nuclear energy? Can anyone think or read anymore?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting poll questions and results. It does, of course, reveal a  liberal bias in the sample, as one might expect.</p>
<p>Even the insiders behind the increasingly obvious political power scam that is &#8220;global warming&#8221; have been replacing that term, with &#8220;climate change&#8221; since legitimate science informs us that a normal cyclical period of global cooling is currently underway. </p>
<p>It is, or should be, clear by now to all that such shifts are not man-made. Yet, none of this seems to be having any effect on DC&#8217;s bizarre locked-in political climate policies, as they continue with mindless anti-ghoulies and ghosties activity.</p>
<p>And what remains unclear about the superior effectiveness and safety of nuclear energy? Can anyone think or read anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

