<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focus: Montauk Springs and Battle of Athens Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://into-nature.com/2008/08/11/focus-montauk-springs-and-battle-of-athens-site-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://into-nature.com/2008/08/11/focus-montauk-springs-and-battle-of-athens-site-2/</link>
	<description>Don Corrigan - Environmental Journalist and Nature Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim DiPeso</title>
		<link>http://into-nature.com/2008/08/11/focus-montauk-springs-and-battle-of-athens-site-2/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim DiPeso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doncorrigan.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing could be worse for the environment than blind partisanship -- whether it&#039;s tin-eared Republicans claiming that conservation is a socialist conspiracy, or haughty Democrats claiming a monopoly on environmental virtue.

Treating the environment as a partisan issue allows politics to trump steady progress in favor of political boom-and-bust cycles -- booms when the &quot;good&quot; party is in power, bust when the political cycle inevitably turns and the &quot;bad&quot; party takes center stage.

Lasting environmental progress will be possible only when both parties make an effort to work together for the good of the country, rather than for partisan advantage.

For that to happen, Republicans must rediscover the stewardship ethic that is at the heart of traditional conservatism and be willing to show environmental leadership. Democrats must set aside stereotyping and give a fair hearing to conservative ideas for taking care of the environment.

There are no Republican rivers, nor are there Democratic forests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing could be worse for the environment than blind partisanship &#8212; whether it&#8217;s tin-eared Republicans claiming that conservation is a socialist conspiracy, or haughty Democrats claiming a monopoly on environmental virtue.</p>
<p>Treating the environment as a partisan issue allows politics to trump steady progress in favor of political boom-and-bust cycles &#8212; booms when the &#8220;good&#8221; party is in power, bust when the political cycle inevitably turns and the &#8220;bad&#8221; party takes center stage.</p>
<p>Lasting environmental progress will be possible only when both parties make an effort to work together for the good of the country, rather than for partisan advantage.</p>
<p>For that to happen, Republicans must rediscover the stewardship ethic that is at the heart of traditional conservatism and be willing to show environmental leadership. Democrats must set aside stereotyping and give a fair hearing to conservative ideas for taking care of the environment.</p>
<p>There are no Republican rivers, nor are there Democratic forests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

